The following are three SharePoint Online governance tips and tricks:
1. Establish clear governance policies and procedures:
A strong foundation for effective SharePoint Online governance is needed to establish clear and comprehensive policies and procedures that outline the guidelines for content creation, management, and access. conventions, metadata usage, and versioning policies to maintain consistency and facilitate efficient content management.
2. Utilize governance tools and solutions:
Leveraging governance tools and solutions can help streamline and enhance governance processes. These tools can automate various tasks, enforce policies, and provide insights into the SharePoint environment.
3. Monitor and enforce governance policies:
Regularly monitor the SharePoint environment to ensure compliance with governance policies and identify any potential issues or deviations. Utilize reporting tools to track site creation, content usage, and permissions based changes.
The following are five questions to ask to self-assess SharePoint governance practices:
1. Is the SharePoint steering committee up to date on the latest developments in information technology from a business perspective?
2. Is the SharePoint steering committee aware of any conflicts between the business units and the information technology units?
3. Does the SharePoint steering committee receive status reports on major information technology projects?
4. Is the SharePoint steering committee briefed often on information technology risks to which the enterprise is exposed?
5. Is the SharePoint steering committee obtaining independent consulting advice on the information technology objectives it is wishing to partake in – and being told of the known risks?
Communication of SharePoint governance standards and polices could
follow a communications path as such:
Content
Have a published governance policy and standards section available for all SharePoint users
Governance Announcements: make sure they are always up to date as changes in regard to policies and initiatives are updated
Format
Utilize a sectioned wiki of core and key information so that content can be easily referenced and linked to
Utilize a blog with proper categories relevant to the areas of the governance that are to be posted
Timing
Update content at least once a month to keep it fresh
Who
The Farm SharePoint Administrators should be responsible for producing and updating the governance information and for communication
Communication can be via formal e-mail communication, an announcement on the SharePoint site itself or via alerts that are set-up in SharePoint (by users or administrators)
The following are some key traits to utilize when managing SharePoint:
1) Building a Team
2) Utilize a Project Methodology
3) Budgeting
4) Technical Architecture
5) Governance
6) Training
7) Change Control
8) Technical Roadmap – Yearly
9) Intake for Requests
10) On-going On-Boarding
11) On-going Changes
12) Handling Overall Growth
When teaching others about SharePoint – the following items
one should be mindful of:
·Observe how you react to mistakes – and not be
defensive – SharePoint is challenging to learn so users should be taught with
patience
·Try new learning techniques – users learn
differently so be mindful of this – therefore creating many different mediums
(live classes, remote classes, videos, quick guides, self-help written modules,
etc.) is essential
·Teach in your area of strength – if one is good
with out of the box SharePoint aspects – they should teach in that area, if one
is good with workflows, they should teach in that area
The following are some key items to consider
when using SharePoint as a platform for change:
1)Let proper team members know of change so that a
plan for how to communicate change to organization can be created
2)Define how SharePoint will be utilized in the
organization. Will its main purpose be document management, content sites or utilization
of key and core workflows
3)Account for governance – know what users will be
allowed and not allow to do. Make the governance plans readily available in a
wiki or series of blog posts.
4)Account for at least a one hour to 90 minute
overview of SharePoint functionality that users will need to know (upload
documents, use lists, how to search, how to use managed metadata, etc.)
5)Develop and fine tune – processes for how best
to manage work and requests in SharePoint by utilizing request forms for
requirements so that an Agile model can be followed by creating from such
requests the needed stories and tasks for what was being asked.
When it comes to what project methodology to utilize in
regard to SharePoint, waterfall is indeed one method.
To use Waterfall with SharePoint the following steps are
followed:
Gather system
requirements – which for SharePoint this usually involves what is needed
for a site/subsite, workflow or piece of functionality (custom web-part, list,
calendar, etc.).
Software requirements
– for SharePoint sake this could involve what features to turn on/off as well
as what functionality to build.
Analysis – look into
SharePoint from a 360 degree overview in order to meet requirements via how
users work today. This involves knowing what works and doesn’t work for users
after talking to them.
Program Design – in
SharePoint speak this would involve the applicable page layout and needed
imagery.
Coding – a developer,
administrator or analyst – would then build the SharePoint functionality.
Testing – users would
utilize a created test script to test and signoff on what was built.
Operation –
functionality is put into production and when changes are needed – the process
steps are repeated as needed.
Overall – SharePoint and agile scrum are a good fit for many
reasons – the common aspects of Epic -> Feature -> Story and Task are
given an overview below of how they fit together in a SharePoint project.
Epics - SharePoint
agile scrum allows teams to formulate epics (which would encompass a major
release) – overall, epics maybe good for a new installation, upgrade, or
cumulative patch of SharePoint.
Features – in SharePoint
agile scrum, a feature (working functionality usually part of an epic) may consist
of creating a custom web part or creating a new workflow for a change control
process (these can be the features that are part of your new install).
Stories – these are
the aspects that need created/built which will allow users to accomplish what
they need to do in the said system. Stories are usually written in the context
of:
As a <>, I
need<>, so that I get <>. Where the text between the < >
would be filled in by the users or an analyst working with a user.
A SharePoint example of a story would be:
As an end user, I need a button which when checked populates
a list so that I get changes from the change control system from the day
before.
Tasks – as part
of a story – tasks will be needed so that the aspects that make up the stories
asked are created and built.
SharePoint example:
Custom
list is created with proper fields
External content type is created
for change control status field
Form is designed with button lookup
to change control system
Thus – core agile scrum methods can indeed work well for
SharePoint and tweaked and defined based on one’s business needs.
The following are
some items to consider to measure that SharePoint is successful:
•End-users
understand the capabilities of the platform and are well trained to use them
•New
sites and applications are systematically introduced with quick time-to-market
leveraging site templates, compliant with standards which follow approved
corporate branding
•Governance
teams review and proactively act based on the usage data and business needs
•Business
users are aware of the security model and help to enforce
•Service-level
agreements (SLAs) are in place, platform performance is good, and any custom
coding and enhancements are well tested
•The
growth of the server farms, servers, and storage is planned out to be scalable
as the business needs
•Operational
costs are in line with business value delivered by the platform